Presidential candidate Sen. John McCain recently pandered to the Religious Right:
“I admire the Islam. There’s a lot of good principles in it,” he said. “But I just have to say in all candor that since this nation was founded primarily on Christian principles, personally, I prefer someone who I know who has a solid grounding in my faith.”
In the interview, the senator also said the “Constitution established the United States of America as a Christian nation.”
I’ll leave out the fact that McCain was referring to something called “the Islam.” (Was he referring to Islam or Muslims?) McCain, of course, has every right to support whomever he wishes, Christian or not, for president. But I want to address the question: Is the United States a Christian nation? That depends on how one defines the term.
The vast majority of Americans, approximately 77 percent, are Christians. As Bradley Burston writes in Ha’aretz, the United States is an unofficial Christian country:
Every Jewish kid in America who has ever worn a kippah in public, every Muslim who has worn external evidence of his or her devotion to Islam, knows very well that Senator McCain was right. Every public school child who was raised in a home where Jesus was not believed to be God, and who was made to sing “Joy to the world, the Lord is come!” with devotion and feeling, knows just how right McCain was. Every high school football player who began every game hearing an invocation to the Lord Jesus Christ, cannot help but wonder what all the fuss is about.
Still, does this mean that the United States is officially a Christian country? Part of McCain’s statement — that America was “founded primarily on Christian principles” — is utterly absurd. Countries are political entities, and religions are sets of theological beliefs and associated practices. The two are completely different. What does the Constitution say about the life, death and purported resurrection of Jesus? Nothing, of course.
So, the United States was not founded on Christian principles, but was it founded as a Christian country? For this to be true, the country’s founding document, the Constitution, would need to state that America is a Christian nation. It does not. Nothing else matters legally or politically.
But let’s look at the evidence that pundit (and film reviewer) Michael Medved uses to prove his case that the United States was founded as a Christian country:
In his Farewell Address of 1797, President Washington (who had also served as presiding officer of the Constitutional Convention) unequivocally declared that “reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle…Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.”
A president’s personal opinions are not constitutional law. They have no legal bearing on the issue of whether America is officially a Christian country.
His successor as president, John Adams (also known as “The Atlas of Independence”) wrote to his wife Abigail in 1775: “Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is Religion and Morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. A patriot must be a religious man.”
A president’s personal opinions are not constitutional law. They have no legal bearing on the issue of whether America is officially a Christian country.
Thomas Jefferson, who disagreed with Adams on so many points of policy, clearly concurred with him on this essential principle. “God who gave us life gave us liberty,” he wrote in 1781. “And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are of the Gift of God?”
A president’s personal opinions are not constitutional law. They have no legal bearing on the issue of whether America is officially a Christian country.
James Madison (acclaimed as “The Father of the Constitution”) declared that “religion is the basis and Foundation of Government,” and later (1825, after retiring from the Presidency) wrote that “the belief in a God All Powerful, wise and good…. is essential to the moral order of the World and the happiness of men.”
A president’s personal opinions are not constitutional law. They have no legal bearing on the issue of whether America is officially a Christian country.
Elias Boudinot of New Jersey, who served as President of the Continental Congress in the last stages of the Revolution (1782-83) wrote: “Our country should be preserved from the dreadful evil of becoming enemies of the religion of the Gospel, which I have no doubt, but would be the introduction of the dissolution of government and the bonds of civil society.”
The personal opinions of a president of the Continental Congress are not constitutional law. They have no legal bearing on the issue of whether America is officially a Christian country.
John Marshall, the father of American Jurisprudence and for 34 epochal years (1801-35) the Chief Justice of the United States, wrote: “The American population is entirely Christian, and with us Christianity and Religion are identified. It would be strange indeed, if with such a people, our institutions did not presuppose Christianity, and did not often refer to it, and exhibit relations with it.”
The personal opinions of a Supreme Court chief justice are not constitutional law. They have no legal bearing on the issue of whether America is officially a Christian country.
…Justice Samuel Chase, delivered an opinion (Runkel v. Winemill) in 1799 declaring: “Religion is of general and public concern, and on its support depend, in great measure, the peace and good order of government, the safety and happiness of the people. By our form of government, the Christian religion is the established religion, and all sects and denominations of Christians are placed upon the same equal footing, and are equally entitled to protection in their religious liberty.” These judicial opinions make clear that the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment never constrained early judges from classifying the United States as an enthusiastically Christian society.
A Supreme Court ruling does not change the Constitution and the fact that the founding document does not identify the United States as a Christian nation.
In fact, the same Congress that approved the First Amendment gave a clear indication of the way they understood its language when, less than 24 hours after adopting the fateful wording, they passed the following Resolution: “Resolved, that a joint committee of both Houses be directed to wait upon the President of the United States, to request that he would recommend to the people of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer, to be observed by acknowledging, with grateful hearts, the many signal favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceable to establish a Constitution of government for their safety and happiness.”
A Congressional resolution does not change the Constitution and the fact that the founding document does not identify the United States as a Christian nation.
George Washington issued the following message to his troops: “The blessing and protection of Heaven are at all times necessary, but especially so in times of public distress and danger. The general hopes and trusts that every officer and man will endeavor to live and act as becomes a Christian soldier, defending the dearest rights and liberties of his country.”
A general’s personal opinions are not constitutional law. They have no legal bearing on the issue of whether America is officially a Christian country.
Two years later, Washington proclaimed: “The commander in chief directs that Divine service be performed every Sunday at 11 o’clock, in each brigade which has a Chaplain….While we are duly performing the duty of good soldiers, we certainly ought not to be inattentive to the higher duties of religion. To the distinguished character of a patriot, it should be our highest glory to add the more distinguished character of a Christian.”
A general’s commands to his troops are not constitutional law. They have no legal bearing on the issue of whether America is officially a Christian country.
THE FOUNDERS WEREN’T ATHEISTS, AGNOSTICS OR SECULARISTS; THEY WERE, ALMOST WITHOUT EXCEPTION, DEEPLY SERIOUS CHRISTIANS.
The personal beliefs of the Founding Fathers have no effect, one way or another, on whether the United States is a Christian country. What matters is the founding document that they wrote — and it does not state that the United States is a Christian country. If the Religious Right does not like this fact, they should advocate for a Constitutional amendment.
The early Supreme Court rulings and Congressional resolutions reflected the fact that the vast majority of Americans were Christians, not that the United States is officially a Christian country. As a New York Times headline writer put it in this op-ed column, a nation of Christians is not a Christian nation. The difference is subtle, but important.

11 responses so far ↓
hkevinderr // 10 October 2007 at 7:54 pm
It is interesting to note that a belief in a supreme being, God or any other name, but it does not make the foundation Christian. It is easier to make the notion that the founding fathers were Diests, not Christians.
This is not to say that there are not a lot of Christians in the nation, but it does not make it a Christian nation. Thanks for you efforts.
Keivn
Ian // 15 October 2007 at 12:24 pm
Thank you for the essay. Another unifying trait to all the quotations you rebutted would be that the mention of morality and God are in no way endorsements of any particular religion. Many Christians assume when they see the word “God”, for example, that it means their interpretation of “God”.
Also, many of the founding fathers were Deists who struggled deeply with the influence of Christianity. Even those who were Christian for the most part understood the dangers of projecting one religion on the new nation. Jefferson himself wrote, “Christianity neither is, nor ever was, a part of the common law.”
Anrosh // 30 October 2007 at 1:28 pm
ithink both faith and religion are 2 different things, yet interconnected. I am not religious but i have faith.
Lake // 23 April 2008 at 8:02 pm
Our country was founded by Christian people. Our government was established and run by Christian men. Our constitution was written by Christian men. Although our country does not declare itself a Christian country. It was founded and our countries morals used to be based on Christian beliefs. While immigration and a change in social interactions has changed our country’s moral beliefs for the worse, there is no denying the fact that this country was founded and will always be a primarily Christian country. John McCain is the future of this country. At this moment in time, our country needs another FDR. John McCain may not be FDR, but at least our country will have a chance to redeem the ignorant actions of those who ignored the clear threats of terrorism even after it struck our country.
Sam Scott // 24 April 2008 at 6:53 pm
Lake,
You write that the United States was founded on Christian beliefs. Exactly which tenents of Christianity are enshrined in the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution?
Lake // 24 April 2008 at 8:04 pm
It was founded by men of Christian beliefs and people of proper morals. Our Independence and Constitution does not poses anything about religion other than you have the right to do as you please. But, if you recall the only reason that thought came about was because of the people who founded this nation (the good Christian people) were escaping the persecution of the Catholics. And, if you care to open yourself to our world situation, religion has much to do with war and conflict. Also, our country knows that it was in a much better place when it believed in its’ good Christian background. And while I mean no offense by words although I take responsibility for them, Our country is primarily a Christian Nation. Some of our most successful presidents have been devote Christians (devote as in believe in their pastor as the deliverer of the good word and support and take responsibility for the beliefs of the church). Our Christian beliefs are not “enshrined” in our government because we know better than to mix business and pleasure (well those of common sense), but they are clearly a major contributor to our culture. Our holidays, our literature, our art, and our language. This topic should never be argued, only defeated. Arguments are for children, discussions are for adults. Let it be known that as the years go by the Christian faith shall be threatened more and more until some thing must happen to preserve it.
- Let all of God’s Children say ‘Amen’!
martymankins // 14 June 2008 at 6:15 pm
I’m with Sam on this one (great post and outline). I understand what Lake is trying to say, but in the end, people’s beliefs and what religion they belong to doesn’t matter in the eyes of the law and constitutional processes.
Say, for example, a porn shop owner is christian. How much of his business is based on christian beliefs? While the United States is not really a business, it was set up and the shop keepers that originally setup the rules and standards believed one way, but understood that you cannot force people to believe in something specific (or anything, for that matter).
I don’t think any of us would deny that people like John Adams and George Washington were not believers. I think what is more correct is that the laws and rules of the official documents of this country are not based on any christian beliefs. They were drafted by men, of which some believed in christianity.
Lake’s states that “Our country is primarily a Christian Nation” and that christian beliefs are “clearly a major contributor to our culture” Culture does not make law and government rules. Culture is how we act towards each other, what we share in life, how we accomplish things. Culture makes up individuals. Each and every person can do as they please, within the confines of the law. And Lake eludes to this above, but I think he’s missing the main point: majority rule isn’t what the United States is about (although modern-day politics and various elected officials have made it seem otherwise). The constitution is about protecting the minority from the majority. Christianity is not under attack or threatened – those who are non-Christian are. For a nation to be based on one type of belief, undermines the beliefs and non-beliefs of the rest of the citizens.
The leaders may have held their own beliefs, but regardless of any personal influence, the laws and rules they established were set up to be neutral to all.
martymankins // 14 June 2008 at 6:17 pm
This line above should be:
” don’t think any of us would deny that people like John Adams and George Washington were believers.”
Living Documents // 27 September 2009 at 2:46 pm
The Founding Father’s were educated men who based the fundamental principles of their work on the science of Natural Law. If they cited their work it would read: Cicero, (Marcus Tullius, 106-43 BC): On the Republic, On the Laws, On Duties, Senate Speeches
koyanisqaatsi // 28 September 2009 at 2:18 am
First, define “Christian”?
Obviously, your definition will necessarily have zero to do with any organized religions – which would be like putting the cart before the horse.
If your definition amounts to some variation of: “A person who follows, or attempts to follow, the teachings of Jesus Christ”, what are those teachings, and how do they differ from the teachings of Moses, in any material way. Bear in mind that Christ stated that he hadn’t come to abolish or change the Mosaic Law…
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.” Matthew 5:17-20
Further, Jesus appeared only to summarize the Commandments and Mosaic Law in his teachings…
“Hearing that Jesus had silenced the Sadducees, the Pharisees got together. One of them, an expert in the law, tested him with this question:
“Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?” Jesus replied: ” ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.” Matthew 22:34-40
So, what in Christ’s teachings was specifically new, or non-Jewish? As I see it, apart from perhaps no divorce except in case of spousal adultery (and who’s following that?), the differences are all in the spiritual, and not material, realm.
So, there are no “Christian principles” that could be held to be the foundation of a secular entity like a nation, that aren’t also “Jewish principles”. And, since the “Jewish principles” predated the Christian ones, it is fairer to say that the USA was founded on “Jewish principles” if any.
Now, define “principle”?
God didn’t hand down any principles; he handed down laws and Commandments. Any man-made principles can’t be retroactively fitted into a view of God’s nature (although religions DO try). So, a principle, being a human construction, can’t possibly be “Christian”, unless it refers to the human side of Christ’s nature. If you think you are living your life according to “Christian principles”, you must agree that you are following the teachings of the man, and not the God. Jesus warned against that…
“As Jesus started on his way, a man ran up to him and fell on his knees before him. “Good teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”
“Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good—except God alone. You know the commandments: ‘Do not murder, do not commit adultery, do not steal, do not give false testimony, do not defraud, honor your father and mother.’”
“Teacher,” he declared, “all these I have kept since I was a boy.”
Jesus looked at him and loved him. “One thing you lack,” he said. “Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.” ”
The USA may have been founded on “Christian principles”, but the building was constructed using bricks of greed and mortar of selfishness. There’s absolutely nothing “Christian” about the American Dream.
koyanisqaatsi // 28 September 2009 at 3:14 am
Lake wrote:
“It was founded by men of Christian beliefs and people of proper morals.”
Proper morals? Morals are always proper to the people who espouse them (even while not living by them). One moral is no better than the next (and all are useful for maintaining order in societies). It’s like saying the founders had proper tastes.
“Our Independence and Constitution does not poses anything about religion other than you have the right to do as you please.”
The Constitution and laws afford you no freedoms at all. All they do is promise punishment to those who break them. You have the non-binding “right” not to suffer any penalties if you obey government rules, nothing more.
Certainly, no organized religion grants anybody the right to do as they please. even if they wanted to, they wouldn’t have the authority to do so.
“But, if you recall the only reason that thought came about was because of the people who founded this nation (the good Christian people) were escaping the persecution of the Catholics.”
Are Catholics not Christians? Did the “good Christian people” persecute the people they found already living on the land when they arrived? If so, how may we consider them either good or Christian? Didn’t many of the Founding Fathers own other human beings and treat them as their personal property? Is that a Christian principle?
“Also, our country knows that it was in a much better place when it believed in its’ good Christian background.”
You mean, when anything went, including mass murder and abuse of the native population and slavery? The political entity known as the USA has never been in a position to be held to be “good”, or founded or maintained on anything but greed, selfishness, discrimination and brute cruelty.
“And while I mean no offense by words although I take responsibility for them, Our country is primarily a Christian Nation.”
Again, it’s not, and never was. It has always been a hypocritical, bogus Christian-in-name-only nation. What actions of its citizens show the USA to be “Christian”? Hypocritical church attendance? Lip service? And if the USA is indeed a Christian nation, how can those of other beliefs ever hope to be full citizens? Surely, the USA is just a country (secular) with some Christian or pseudo-Christian citizens?
“Our Christian beliefs are not “enshrined” in our government because we know better than to mix business and pleasure (well those of common sense), but they are clearly a major contributor to our culture.”
What Christian beliefs? That Jesus Christ lives and is the Son of God? Do the people of the USA really believe that? If so, how do they reconcile their actions throughout history with believing that and knowing what Christ taught about the need to repent sins?
“Our holidays, our literature, our art, and our language.”
You’d be more accurate, in that respect, to say that the USA is a Santaclausian/Easterbunnian/Halloweenian nation.
“This topic should never be argued, only defeated.”
Well, I must say that I didn’t expect the Spanish Inquisition!
“Let it be known that as the years go by the Christian faith shall be threatened more and more until some thing must happen to preserve it.”
How could faith ever be threatened? Beliefs can’t be proven of disproven. You choose to believe what you believe. Nobody can threaten you out of a believing something. Not even the Thought Police (try forcing yourself – at gunpoint if necessary – not to believe something you already believe).
What you seem to be referring to is the forced compliance and lip service to a religion, along with the forced intermingling of the rites, rituals and practices of a religion with secular life. Jesus’ teachings are based on the fact that we have a free will.
“- Let all of God’s Children say ‘Amen’!”
“Amen, meaning ’so be it’, is of Hebrew origin… The Talmud teaches homiletically that the word Amen is an acronym for אל מלך נאמן (’El melekh ne’eman, “God, trustworthy King”),[11] the phrase recited silently by an individual before reciting the Shma.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amen
Did Jesus teach that we should say Amen? If not, why should all “God’s Children” say it?
I’m getting the impression Lake is really Jewish.